Home
Benefits
 of Cloth
Environment
Lify Cycle Analysis
The Diaper
 Debate
99% Less
 Garbage
The Joy
of Cloth
Disposable
 Myth
Three
 Choices
Environmental
 Links
Skin Care
Health
Links
Environment

Cotton Diapers are Preferred Among Environmental Experts

   From the Sierra Club to the Environmental Defense Fund, environmental experts and activists agree that cotton diapers are the better environmental diapering choice.
   So if you're skeptical about environmental claims from manufacturers (and even from the diaper service industry), you can believe the environmentalists. They've seen all the data and heard all the arguments. They have nothing to gain, yet they clearly support cloth diapers.
   For them, and for us, it's still a basic idea: Reusable products that have a long life span are a better environmental choice than single-use products with a short lifespan. Always have been. Always will
.

Supporting Environmental Groups include:

Landbank Consultancy                                 
The Sierra Club                                           
Waste Information Network                          
Women's Environmental Network, UK          
Women's Environmental Network, USA        
Environmental Defense Fund                        
Washington Environmental Council               
Rhode Island Solid Waste Management Corporation
West Michigan Environmental Action Council
Connecticut General Assembly -- Office of legislative Research
Center for Policy Alternatives
Environmental Action Foundation
King County Nurses Association
Ann Arbor Ecology Center
Natural Health Magazine
New York Public Interest Group
Washington Citizens for Recycling

Environmental Facts

   On issues such as solid waste, total energy use and water consumption, diaper service cotton diapers are softer on the environment than either home-washed cotton diapers or, more importantly, single-use, disposable diapers.
   The comprehensive study from Lehrburger- Mullen-Jones reached this conclusion:

 "
Disposable diapers are shown to generate significantly more solid waste, (and) to consume greater quantities of energy and raw materials on a per-diaper-change basis."

 This study, hailed by environmentalists around the country, analyzed diapers from production to use to disposal.
   It indicated that single-use diapers contribute over seven times as much solid waste as reusable cotton diapers. Also, the study found that

"
Commercially laundered cotton diapers use one-half the energy of home washed and one-third the energy of disposable diapers. Home laundering uses 2.5 times as much net water per diaper change than diaper service."

 Due to efficient equipment use and economies of scale, diaper services have lower resource and environmental impacts than either home-washed or disposable diapers.

The Landbank Consultancy,

   an independent organization which conducted -- at it's own expense -- an analysis of the two "life-cycle" studies commissioned by Procter & Gamble, and found them both to be severely deficient. The Landbank Consultancy used P&G's own data to arrive at startling different conclusions:
Disposable diapers

   1. Produce 60 times more energy
   2. Use three times more energy
   3. Consume between 10 and 20 times more raw materials
   4. Consume two times as much water, even when cotton growing is factored in.

   Reuse is always better than single use! Their own data proves it!